We create and deliver in-house workshops based on our expertise in:
The following principles define what an Ascent workshop will be like:
Planned
Experiential
Focused
Simple
Signposted
Safe
Challenging
Individualised
Facilitated
– Our inputs are not ‘True’ but rather are provocations and summaries of our own beliefs and principles. There will always be another point of view on our material and we welcome constructive challenge and debate wherever it does not detract from the learning journeys of the majority.
We use the following principles to act as our handrail for creating high-impact, tailor made, immersive workshops consistently.
We conceive the sequence in three ‘scenes’.
In the first scene we are present in a chosen and deliberate way for the delegates. This includes the arrivals and registration process. We may choose to be ‘warm adults’ or, perhaps, ‘rebellious children’ (unlikely, but possible). However we choose to be, it is a choice, part of the event (which has already begun) and must be specified as such in line with the developmental objectives of the course.
Before delegates are settled and the traditional workshop routines of introductions and welcomes are enacted, our courses feature a ‘curtain up’ event. It may be a question, an experience, a film, a piece of music or something else entirely. Whatever is specified in the design will be intended to take participants out of their normal experience of a day and into an experiential development event.
Thereafter we do the course introductions; connecting the topic to its theoretical underpinning, contract with participants and generally ‘check-in’.
In the second scene we engage the participants in a minimum of two complete ‘experiential cycles’. The starting point on each cycle is not specified and a choice in the design process.
Where time is particularly short, the ‘experience’ element of the cycle may be quite short. A short (30 mins or under) activity may even be curtailed once an essential ‘review point’ has been experienced.
We recommend forcibly against curtailing the review, however. We regard the review as the ‘crucible’ of the meaning and sense making learning process.
We believe it is essential to have a minimum of two full cycles to ensure that the ‘behaviour’ element (where participants hypothesise on their personal learning and resolve to practice a fresh approach in future) is tested.
The second review may, resources permitting, be conducted in small groups – even one-to-one with a coach facilitator.
In the third scene we are wrapping up and ending well. Participants should have the time and the opportunity to give and receive feedback (this may equally be incorporated into the review processes in scene two), reflect on their experience and make personal commitments (which we encourage them to share as a part of their ‘check-out’) about how this experience will affect their future behaviour.
We close with thanks and by enquiring how we can improve our service and performance.
“In the process of learning, one moves in varying degrees from actor to observer and from specific involvement to general analytic detachment."
“What we look for in our people is the ability to take complex material, simplify it and communicate it to a sophisticated audience.”
A satisfied client is still dissatisfied.
© 2019 Ascent Coaching. All Rights Reserved